The twenty reviews written by student Cappies for the production of Shrek were effusive. Reading through them quickly my heart rate increased even without leaving my chair. Having worked for months elbow to elbow with the cast, the stage crew as well as the orchestra the feedback felt great.
"Academy of the New Church
undertook the difficult task of performing a fantasy production with intricate character costuming and makeup, and yet the production captivated the audience with mesmerizing set pieces, impressive acting, and likable characters who brought the story to life."
"Bradley Robinson, who played Donkey, was an audience favorite. His nearly perfect comedic timing, charming voice, and overall lovable portrayal of the character led many to await the moments he returned
to the stage. Pinocchio, played by James Gay also served as a fan favorite, impressively carrying his comedic performance out in falsetto, an incredibly difficult task that Gay made seem natural."
Plus we were nominated for a slew of awards including lighting, scenery, and make-up.
Then I came across one review that used an adjective, well incorrectly. I wondered if she knew what the word actually meant. Which jolted me
into the remembrance that these are simply opinions. The added credence of being published does not make them infallible.
I kept reading and came across two with opposing views. One claimed that the wait time for scene changes was too long. Another described them as brief.
Both writers attended the same show, which means the physical experience was identical. Yet they held them differently.
Interesting.
Maybe the critical reviews
I give to my own life have leeway for seeing it in a good light. Plus I could edit them before publishing widely.
